discussion, gear, and photography journal
Stolen Photo - a Recent Experience

This blog post was inspired by an issue which recently occurred in my own workplace.

Several months ago, while reading an employee-only internal newsletter published by my employer, I happened to recognise a photo (shown below) that had been used in the headline of the newsletter, and was also used on the company intranet (linking to the newsletter).

That particular photo is available on my website, and is clearly labelled as a copyright image that cannot be used without permission. No-one had requested my permission to use the photo.

the stolen photo - lonely autumn leaf
the stolen photo - lonely autumn leaf
Matilda Bay, Western Australia
Canon EOS 350D, 17-85mm IS @76mm, 1/125 sec, f/5.6, ISO400

Some digging through my webserver logs indicated that a colleague had found the image while doing a Google image search for images relating to autumn.

I only happened to see the photo in the publication because I'm an employee of the company, and hence have access to this particular newsletter. If the photo had been used in any other company, I wouldn't have noticed!


What would you do?

If you notice that a colleague has "stolen" one of your photos, and is using it without your permission in an internal employee-only publication, what would you do?
Post details on how you would respond using the comments facility below.

I'll be posting details in a future blog post on how this particular issue was handled.


Edit: I've posted a follow-up article here.
If you enjoyed this post, then subscribe to the RSS feed, or subscribe by email to get updates directly in your inbox.
Comments:
Alex wrote at 2008-06-17 08:39

I was just reading about a copyright infringement (http://www.photosig.com/go/forums/read?id=238502) and then came along your post.

It's an un-fourtunate situation and I'd find it a difficult one to deal with. How many people are in circulation and seeing the photo? Perhaps ask for credit/reference whenever it's used? Personally I would probably avoid chasing money for the usage as afterall it's your work force and could create an ugly situation?

Dave Pearson wrote at 2008-06-18 02:50

The first thing I'd do is speak to the person responsible for the publication and ask what was going on.

Tim wrote at 2008-06-18 03:42

Well, that's obvious. Remember there used to be a time before everyone was litigiously minded about copyright? People actually had to communicate without the aid of lawyers... so just go round there, invert a bucket of cold water over the perpetrator and explain in words of one syllable *why* they're a numpty.

Jason wrote at 2008-06-18 20:01

Umm, to put it a bit bluntly, don't be a douche.

Talk to the guy, ask him to put credit lines in future publications. Bringing legal issues into anything is just asking for trouble, and even if it wasn't a workplace thing, it's just kind of, annoying.

Ben wrote at 2008-06-19 07:14

I agree with Jason. You're really over exaggerating the situation. Just talk to the guy and request that proper credit be given to you. Chances are, it was an accident, as most people find an image they need through Google image search in a hurry to finish their school project, independent [workplace] publication, etc. and go ahead and save the image without reading anything at all on the website.

Not to mention.. Sorry, but the image isn't really something to make a big deal of. It's looks like it was simply just a point-and-shoot image using the macro mode that pretty much anyone with a semi-decent digital camera could produce.

Dave Pearson wrote at 2008-06-20 03:31

@Ben: It shouldn't really matter how good or bad (or any other measure) you think the image is. Neither should it matter how easy or hard it might be to photograph such an image. The issue still stands.

Martin wrote at 2008-06-22 01:48

Thanks for the comments.

@Jason: legal issues are more than just annoying - they can be very costly to people who chose to violate copyright.
Having an image used in an internal publication without permission is one thing...but what if the same employee used an unauthorised image for some public marketing material, and the copyright owner happened to notice it?

@Ben: the image itself isn't the subject of discussion - the focus of this blog post is on unauthorised use of your photos.

Nick wrote at 2008-06-25 09:35

I guess, if I were to find my images/photos used somewhere, I would probably be thrilled that someone found them worthy. At the same time, I think that whoever took the image should be given credit. For example, a link that points back to the image source or a byline in print that would direct people to the source.

Personally, I'm not a huge fan of the whole "you must ask permission" philosophy that you adhere to (from what I read on your policies and such) but agree that credit must be given. For one thing, if I happen to find an image I want to use in a post, I probably will want to publish the post within the next couple hours and waiting for a response for permission can sometimes take several days (depending on whose permission you are asking for) but again, my photos are not quite as professional and high-profile as yours.

Brian wrote at 2008-08-28 18:13

I don't know if that works for you... have you consider this approach by sending someone this letter form called "cease desist" letter, something looks like saying as follow:

Dear [name]:
It has come to my attention that you have made an unauthorized use of my copyrighted work entitled [name of work] (the "Work") in the preparation of a work derived therefrom. I have reserved all rights in the Work, first published in [date], [and have registered copyright therein]. Your work entitled [name of infringing work] is essentially identical to the Work and clearly used the Work as its basis. [Give a few examples that illustrate direct copying.]
As you neither asked for nor received permission to use the Work as the basis for [name of infringing work] nor to make or distribute copies, including electronic copies, of same, I believe you have willfully infringed my rights under 17 U.S.C. Section 101 et seq. and could be liable for statutory damages as high as $150,000 as set forth in Section 504(c)(2) therein.
I demand that you immediately cease the use and distribution of all infringing works derived from the Work, and all copies, including electronic copies, of same, that you deliver to me, if applicable, all unused, undistributed copies of same, or destroy such copies immediately and that you desist from this or any other infringement of my rights in the future. If I have not received an affirmative response from you by [date give them about 2 weeks] indicating that you have fully complied with these requirements, I shall take further action against you.
Very truly yours,

Anyway, that truly sucks when something happens when somebody pass it off as he/she own it WITHOUT asking for permission. I hope that your image has "secret" data in it to prove that it is YOURS.

Has your situation has been resolved, no?

Martin wrote at 2008-08-30 13:44

@Brian: Yes, this particular issue has been resolved - see this blog post for more details on the resolution.

crequance wrote at 2009-03-05 10:24

Excellent site martybugs.net and I am really pleased to see you have what I am actually looking for here: this .. as it's taken me literally 1 hours and 11 minutes of searching the web to find you (just kidding!) so I shall be pleased to become a regular visitor :)

Add your thoughts:
Name* (use your real name or initials, not your business name):
Email address* (required, never published):
URL (optional, "nofollow" attributes are used on URLs):
Comments* (no HTML allowed, some BBcode allowed, "nofollow" attributes are used on URLs):
 Check this box if you are a real person*
  
BBcode allowed in comments:
[b]bold[/b]
[i]italics[/i]
[url=http://server/path]link name[/url]
[img]http://server/path/image.jpg[/img]
Fields marked with a * are mandatory.
Note that comments are moderated, and will not appear immediately.
Please do not include your URL in the comment text, and please use your personal name or initials, and not your business name, as that comes across as spam.
learn more about your camera and how to use it
making photo books? save with Blurb discount coupons
Blurb
[ MartyBugs home | blog | about this site | copyright | disclaimer | privacy | appreciation | contact details | site map ]
web by mpot.  all content and images are copyright © 2001-2025 .
all rights reserved.  unauthorised duplication, reproduction or distribution is prohibited.
martybugs.net